| 1 |
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 12:22:59 Mike Kazantsev wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:58 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:49:39 Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > To completely get rid of libxcb-xlib.so references, please read : |
| 8 |
> > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide. |
| 9 |
> > > >xml |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Since my browser got broken, too, this took some time. |
| 12 |
> > > And following that advice takes even much more time, since |
| 13 |
> > > I have to rebuild half of my system. |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Luckily it has 4 cores, |
| 16 |
> > > Helmut. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > The gods must be favouring me for a change. I'm completely unaffected |
| 19 |
> > by this upgrade :-) |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > $ sudo /var/portage/x11-libs/libxcb/files/xcb-rebuilder.sh |
| 22 |
> > Password: |
| 23 |
> > * Fixing broken libtool archives (.la) |
| 24 |
> > * Scanning for libraries requiring libxcb-xlib.so... |
| 25 |
> > * No broken libraries detected |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > I wonder what I did different? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Prehaps nothing. |
| 30 |
> Rebuild warning is triggered by a check for libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0, which |
| 31 |
> didn't seem to exist on my system either. |
| 32 |
> Guess "xcb" use-flag for libX11 is to blame: if it's not set, then |
| 33 |
> older libX11 brought along it's own libxcb. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Yes, that's what it is. I too have USE="-xcb" for libX11 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives