1 |
On 2009-10-02, Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Grant Edwards wrote: |
5 |
>>> <SNIP> |
6 |
>>> and my brain just doesn't work the way vi does. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> I'm with you Grant. Mine doesn't work that way either. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> You guys do know that Bill Joy was lopsided drunk when he |
11 |
> wrote the bulk of vi ... right? (or so it is said by |
12 |
> oldtimers) |
13 |
|
14 |
Now that you mention it, I have heard that. :) |
15 |
|
16 |
> Nobodys' brain works that way on purpose... You have to make |
17 |
> it happen with practice (or alcohol). I should know... I've |
18 |
> been practicing for 12 yrs and tried the alcohol technique |
19 |
> before becoming a teetotaller some time earlier, and still a |
20 |
> very long ways from being an adept. Or even a competent for |
21 |
> that matter. |
22 |
|
23 |
OTOH, watching somebody who _is_ adept with vi (or ed) is not |
24 |
something one soon forgets. There were several things I've |
25 |
watched that would have taken me twice as long to do in emacs |
26 |
(but would take 16X as long for _me_ to do it in vi). |
27 |
|
28 |
> But still compared to nano, even just the basic open file/ |
29 |
> write to file/ close file... is done better and easier from |
30 |
> vi. |
31 |
|
32 |
Though I stumble around in nano rather badly, at least the |
33 |
failure modes seem a lot less damaging that what I manage to do |
34 |
in vi. With vi, I generally have to abandon the edit and start |
35 |
over at least 2 or 3 times. |
36 |
|
37 |
> However, all that said... it still isn't a big deal having |
38 |
> nano there at first ... Install disks are networked right off |
39 |
> the bat these days, so its not long before you can emerge vim |
40 |
> or emacs, you don't have to put up with nano for long. |
41 |
|
42 |
Exactly. I usually emerge jed first (which has a good emacs |
43 |
mode), and then switch over to emacs once I get things going. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Am I in Milwaukee? |
47 |
at |
48 |
visi.com |