Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:53:15
Message-Id: CAK2H+ed1DdB8q3fAU0Rw5sxHny2Rm9nTD4_W6x=6-9RwcXyXyA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? by Norman Invasion
1 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Norman Invasion
2 <invasivenorman@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > On 10 May 2012 14:01, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Norman Invasion
5 >> <invasivenorman@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >>> On 9 May 2012 04:47, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
7 >>>> Hi,
8 >>>>
9 >>>> As some know, I'm planning to buy me a LARGE hard drive to put all my
10 >>>> videos on, eventually.  The prices are coming down now.  I keep seeing
11 >>>> these "green" drives that are made by just about every company nowadays.
12 >>>>  When comparing them to a non "green" drive, do they hold up as good?
13 >>>> Are they as dependable as a plain drive?  I guess they are more
14 >>>> efficient and I get that but do they break quicker, more often or no
15 >>>> difference?
16 >>>>
17 >>>> I have noticed that they tend to spin slower and are cheaper.  That much
18 >>>> I have figured out.  Other than that, I can't see any other difference.
19 >>>>  Data speeds seem to be about the same.
20 >>>>
21 >>>
22 >>> They have an ugly tendency to nod off at 6 second intervals.
23 >>> This runs up "193 Load_Cycle_Count" unacceptably: as many
24 >>> as a few hundred thousand in a year & a million cycles is
25 >>> getting close to the lifetime limit on most hard drives.  I end
26 >>> up running some iteration of
27 >>> # hdparm -B 255 /dev/sda
28 >>> every boot.
29 >>>
30 >>
31 >> Very true about the 193 count. Here's a drive in a system that was
32 >> built in Jan., 2010 so it's a bit over 2 years old at this point. It's
33 >> on 24/7 and not rebooted except for more major updates, etc. My tests
34 >> say the drive spins down and starts back up every 2 minutes and has
35 >> been doing so for about 28 months. IIRC the 193 spec on this drive was
36 >> something like 300000 max with the drive currently clocking in at
37 >> 700488. I don't see any evidence that it's going to fail but I am
38 >> trying to make sure it's backed up often. Being that it's gone >2x at
39 >> this point I will swap the drive out in the early summer no matter
40 >> what. This week I'll be visiting where the machine is so I'm going to
41 >> put a backup drive in the box to get ready.
42 >>
43 >
44 > Yes, I just learned about this problem in 2009 or so, &
45 > checked on my FreeBSD laptop, which turned out to be
46 > at >400000.  It only made it another month or so before
47 > having unrecoverable errors.
48 >
49 > Now, I can't conclusively demonstrate that the 193
50 > Load_Cycle_Count was somehow causitive, but I
51 > gots my suspicions.  Many of 'em highly suspectable.
52 >
53
54 It's part of the 'Wear Out Failure' part of the Bathtub Curve posted
55 in the last few days. That said, some Toyotas go 100K miles, and
56 others go 500K miles. Same car, same spec, same production line,
57 different owners, different roads, different climates, etc.
58
59 It's not possible to absolutely know when any drive will fail. I
60 suspect that the 300K spec is just that, a spec. They'd replace the
61 drive if it failed at 299,999 and wouldn't replace it at 300,001. That
62 said, they don't want to spec thing too tightly, and I doubt many
63 people make a purchasing decision on a spec like this, so for the vast
64 majority of drives most likely they'd do far more than 300K.
65
66 At 2 minutes per count on that specific WD Green Drive, if a home
67 machine is turned on for instance 5 hours a day (6PM to 11PM) then
68 300K count equates to around 6 years. To me that seems pretty generous
69 for a low cost home machine. However for a 24/7 production server it's
70 a pretty fast replacement schedule.
71
72 Here's data for my 500GB WD RAID Edition drives in my compute server
73 here. It's powered down almost every night but doesn't suffer from the
74 same firmware issues. The machine was built in April, 2010, so it's a
75 bit of 2 years old. Note that it's been powered on less than 1/2 the
76 number of hours but only has a 193 count of 907 vs > 700000!
77
78 Cheers,
79 Mark
80
81
82 c2stable ~ # smartctl -a /dev/sda
83 smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [x86_64-linux-3.2.12-gentoo] (local build)
84 Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
85
86 === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
87 Model Family: Western Digital RE3 Serial ATA
88 Device Model: WDC WD5002ABYS-02B1B0
89 Serial Number: WD-WCASYA846988
90 LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 2042c3477
91 Firmware Version: 02.03B03
92 User Capacity: 500,107,862,016 bytes [500 GB]
93 Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
94 Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
95 ATA Version is: 8
96 ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated
97 Local Time is: Thu May 10 11:45:45 2012 PDT
98 SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
99 SMART support is: Enabled
100
101 === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
102 SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
103
104 General SMART Values:
105 Offline data collection status: (0x84) Offline data collection activity
106 was suspended by an
107 interrupting command from host.
108 Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled.
109 Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed
110 without error or no self-test has ever
111 been run.
112 Total time to complete Offline
113 data collection: ( 9480) seconds.
114 Offline data collection
115 capabilities: (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
116 Auto Offline data collection
117 on/off support.
118 Suspend Offline collection upon new
119 command.
120 Offline surface scan supported.
121 Self-test supported.
122 Conveyance Self-test
123 supported.
124 Selective Self-test supported.
125 SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before
126 entering
127 power-saving mode.
128 Supports SMART auto save
129 timer.
130 Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported.
131 General Purpose Logging
132 supported.
133 Short self-test routine
134 recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes.
135 Extended self-test routine
136 recommended polling time: ( 112) minutes.
137 Conveyance self-test routine
138 recommended polling time: ( 5) minutes.
139 SCT capabilities: (0x303f) SCT Status supported.
140 SCT Error Recovery Control
141 supported.
142 SCT Feature Control supported.
143 SCT Data Table supported.
144
145 SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
146 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
147 ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
148 UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
149 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051 Pre-fail
150 Always - 0
151 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 239 235 021 Pre-fail
152 Always - 1050
153 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
154 Always - 935
155 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
156 Always - 0
157 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000 Old_age
158 Always - 0
159 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age
160 Always - 7281
161 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
162 Always - 0
163 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
164 Always - 0
165 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
166 Always - 933
167 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
168 Always - 27
169 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
170 Always - 907
171 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 106 086 000 Old_age
172 Always - 41
173 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
174 Always - 0
175 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
176 Always - 0
177 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 200 200 000 Old_age
178 Offline - 0
179 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
180 Always - 0
181 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age
182 Offline - 0

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>