Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 09:37:35
Message-Id: 201205121035.02106.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? by Mark Knecht
1 On Thursday 10 May 2012 19:51:14 Mark Knecht wrote:
2 > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Norman Invasion
3 >
4 > <invasivenorman@×××××.com> wrote:
5 > > On 10 May 2012 14:01, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
6 > >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Norman Invasion
7 > >>
8 > >> <invasivenorman@×××××.com> wrote:
9 > >>> On 9 May 2012 04:47, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
10 > >>>> Hi,
11 > >>>>
12 > >>>> As some know, I'm planning to buy me a LARGE hard drive to put all my
13 > >>>> videos on, eventually. The prices are coming down now. I keep seeing
14 > >>>> these "green" drives that are made by just about every company
15 > >>>> nowadays. When comparing them to a non "green" drive, do they hold up
16 > >>>> as good? Are they as dependable as a plain drive? I guess they are
17 > >>>> more efficient and I get that but do they break quicker, more often
18 > >>>> or no difference?
19 > >>>>
20 > >>>> I have noticed that they tend to spin slower and are cheaper. That
21 > >>>> much I have figured out. Other than that, I can't see any other
22 > >>>> difference. Data speeds seem to be about the same.
23 > >>>
24 > >>> They have an ugly tendency to nod off at 6 second intervals.
25 > >>> This runs up "193 Load_Cycle_Count" unacceptably: as many
26 > >>> as a few hundred thousand in a year & a million cycles is
27 > >>> getting close to the lifetime limit on most hard drives. I end
28 > >>> up running some iteration of
29 > >>> # hdparm -B 255 /dev/sda
30 > >>> every boot.
31 > >>
32 > >> Very true about the 193 count. Here's a drive in a system that was
33 > >> built in Jan., 2010 so it's a bit over 2 years old at this point. It's
34 > >> on 24/7 and not rebooted except for more major updates, etc. My tests
35 > >> say the drive spins down and starts back up every 2 minutes and has
36 > >> been doing so for about 28 months. IIRC the 193 spec on this drive was
37 > >> something like 300000 max with the drive currently clocking in at
38 > >> 700488. I don't see any evidence that it's going to fail but I am
39 > >> trying to make sure it's backed up often. Being that it's gone >2x at
40 > >> this point I will swap the drive out in the early summer no matter
41 > >> what. This week I'll be visiting where the machine is so I'm going to
42 > >> put a backup drive in the box to get ready.
43 > >
44 > > Yes, I just learned about this problem in 2009 or so, &
45 > > checked on my FreeBSD laptop, which turned out to be
46 > > at >400000. It only made it another month or so before
47 > > having unrecoverable errors.
48 > >
49 > > Now, I can't conclusively demonstrate that the 193
50 > > Load_Cycle_Count was somehow causitive, but I
51 > > gots my suspicions. Many of 'em highly suspectable.
52 >
53 > It's part of the 'Wear Out Failure' part of the Bathtub Curve posted
54 > in the last few days. That said, some Toyotas go 100K miles, and
55 > others go 500K miles. Same car, same spec, same production line,
56 > different owners, different roads, different climates, etc.
57 >
58 > It's not possible to absolutely know when any drive will fail. I
59 > suspect that the 300K spec is just that, a spec. They'd replace the
60 > drive if it failed at 299,999 and wouldn't replace it at 300,001. That
61 > said, they don't want to spec thing too tightly, and I doubt many
62 > people make a purchasing decision on a spec like this, so for the vast
63 > majority of drives most likely they'd do far more than 300K.
64 >
65 > At 2 minutes per count on that specific WD Green Drive, if a home
66 > machine is turned on for instance 5 hours a day (6PM to 11PM) then
67 > 300K count equates to around 6 years. To me that seems pretty generous
68 > for a low cost home machine. However for a 24/7 production server it's
69 > a pretty fast replacement schedule.
70 >
71 > Here's data for my 500GB WD RAID Edition drives in my compute server
72 > here. It's powered down almost every night but doesn't suffer from the
73 > same firmware issues. The machine was built in April, 2010, so it's a
74 > bit of 2 years old. Note that it's been powered on less than 1/2 the
75 > number of hours but only has a 193 count of 907 vs > 700000!
76 >
77 > Cheers,
78 > Mark
79 >
80 >
81 > c2stable ~ # smartctl -a /dev/sda
82 > smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [x86_64-linux-3.2.12-gentoo] (local build)
83 > Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
84 >
85 > === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
86 > Model Family: Western Digital RE3 Serial ATA
87 > Device Model: WDC WD5002ABYS-02B1B0
88 > Serial Number: WD-WCASYA846988
89 > LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 2042c3477
90 > Firmware Version: 02.03B03
91 > User Capacity: 500,107,862,016 bytes [500 GB]
92 > Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
93 > Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
94 > ATA Version is: 8
95 > ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated
96 > Local Time is: Thu May 10 11:45:45 2012 PDT
97 > SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
98 > SMART support is: Enabled
99 >
100 > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
101 > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
102 >
103 > General SMART Values:
104 > Offline data collection status: (0x84) Offline data collection activity
105 > was suspended by an
106 > interrupting command from host.
107 > Auto Offline Data Collection:
108 > Enabled. Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test
109 > routine completed without error or no self-test has ever been run.
110 > Total time to complete Offline
111 > data collection: ( 9480) seconds.
112 > Offline data collection
113 > capabilities: (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
114 > Auto Offline data collection
115 > on/off support.
116 > Suspend Offline collection upon new
117 > command.
118 > Offline surface scan supported.
119 > Self-test supported.
120 > Conveyance Self-test
121 > supported.
122 > Selective Self-test supported.
123 > SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before
124 > entering
125 > power-saving mode.
126 > Supports SMART auto save
127 > timer.
128 > Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported.
129 > General Purpose Logging
130 > supported.
131 > Short self-test routine
132 > recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes.
133 > Extended self-test routine
134 > recommended polling time: ( 112) minutes.
135 > Conveyance self-test routine
136 > recommended polling time: ( 5) minutes.
137 > SCT capabilities: (0x303f) SCT Status supported.
138 > SCT Error Recovery Control
139 > supported.
140 > SCT Feature Control supported.
141 > SCT Data Table supported.
142 >
143 > SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
144 > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
145 > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
146 > UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
147 > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051 Pre-fail
148 > Always - 0
149 > 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 239 235 021 Pre-fail
150 > Always - 1050
151 > 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
152 > Always - 935
153 > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
154 > Always - 0
155 > 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000 Old_age
156 > Always - 0
157 > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age
158 > Always - 7281
159 > 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
160 > Always - 0
161 > 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
162 > Always - 0
163 > 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
164 > Always - 933
165 > 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
166 > Always - 27
167 > 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
168 > Always - 907
169 > 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 106 086 000 Old_age
170 > Always - 41
171 > 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
172 > Always - 0
173 > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
174 > Always - 0
175 > 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 200 200 000 Old_age
176 > Offline - 0
177 > 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
178 > Always - 0
179 > 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age
180 > Offline - 0
181
182 Is this 193 Load_Cycle_Count an issue only on the green drives?
183
184 I have a very old Compaq laptop here that shows:
185
186 # smartctl -A /dev/sda | egrep "Power_On|Load_Cycle"
187 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 055 055 000 Old_age Always
188 - 19830
189 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0012 001 001 000 Old_age Always
190 - 1739734
191
192 Admittedly, there are some 60 errors on it (having been used extensively on
193 bouncy trains, buses, aeroplanes, etc) but it is still refusing to die ...
194 O_O
195
196 It is a Hitachi 20G
197
198 === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
199 Model Family: Hitachi Travelstar 80GN
200 Device Model: IC25N020ATMR04-0
201 Serial Number: MRX107K1DS623H
202 Firmware Version: MO1OAD5A
203 User Capacity: 20,003,880,960 bytes [20.0 GB]
204 Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
205 Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
206 ATA Version is: 6
207 ATA Standard is: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 3a
208 Local Time is: Sat May 12 10:30:13 2012 BST
209 SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
210 SMART support is: Enabled
211
212 === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
213
214 --
215 Regards,
216 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? David Haller <gentoo@×××××××.de>