| 1 |
Am 26.08.2013 20:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: |
| 2 |
> Am 26.08.2013 18:35, schrieb Pandu Poluan: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
>> That said, when I was hunting around for information on ZFS before taking |
| 5 |
>> the plunge, a *lot* of discussion revolves around using ZFS as the storage |
| 6 |
>> back-end for virtualization, be it using KVM or VMware. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Yes. I will research that a bit and consider it. |
| 9 |
> Maybe I suggest them a test-phase (old server still there and OK ... so |
| 10 |
> why not) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
When I read stuff like this: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
https://groups.google.com/a/zfsonlinux.org/forum/#!searchin/zfs-discuss/kvm/zfs-discuss/OI5dchl7d_8/G7g8ExR_rHcJ |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I wonder if I should dare to try that ;-) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Another option would be: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I once sliced disks into partitions like this: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
sd[abcdefgh]1 -> RAID1 for / |
| 25 |
sd[abcdefgh]2 -> swap |
| 26 |
sd[abcdefgh]3 -> RAID6 -> PV -> LVs ... for data and VMs |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
What about that? (I think I also had a small RAID for /boot) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Or: |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
sd[ab]X -> RAID1 for / |
| 33 |
sd[cdefgh]X -> RAID6 -> PV -> LVs ... for data and VMs |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Opinions? |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Thanks, Stefan |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
(I don't mention my consideration to use systemd on that server :-P ) |
Archives