| 1 |
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:49 +0200 |
| 2 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 19/02/2014 16:54, Gevisz wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I was recently told that I will have to use WordPress to do some |
| 7 |
> > translation job. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > After emerge --search wordpress, I have found that this package is |
| 10 |
> > currently masked (at least for amd64 architecture). The same says |
| 11 |
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/WordPress |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> www-apps/wordpress is not hardmasked. It is marked ~arch, something |
| 15 |
> entirely different. The correct description for this package is |
| 16 |
> "keyworded unstable" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > Earlier, in this mailing list, I was told that I can see the reasons |
| 20 |
> > for masking a package in .../profile/package.mask file. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> That file does not document unstable keywords |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > However, looking into it, I have not found there the wordpress |
| 26 |
> > package at all. |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > Does anybody know, why wordpress package is currently masked and how |
| 29 |
> > dangerous it is to unmask it as the wikipage above advises. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> packages are keyworded unstable because they are not yet ready for |
| 32 |
> prime-time, or the maintainer hasn't gotten around to marking it |
| 33 |
> stable yet, or no-one has submitted a stabilization request to b.g.o |
| 34 |
> yet |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> We don't know which of these apply |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Just add www-apps/wordpress to package.accept_keywords and emerge it. |
| 39 |
> You will soon find out if it suits your needs and it won't eat your |
| 40 |
> kittens. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> > |
| 43 |
> > Moreover, I am interested if there are any substitutions for the |
| 44 |
> > wordpress package available in Gentoo. |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> No, that does not make sense. The only thing that works like wordpress |
| 47 |
> is wordpress. If you need to use wordpress then install wordpress. |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> There exists other blogging software of course but they are not |
| 50 |
> wordpress. |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> > |
| 53 |
> > By a quick search, I have found vimpress plugin for vim. |
| 54 |
> > |
| 55 |
> > Does anybody know if it is a decent substitution for wordpress? |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> I doubt it does what you apear to think it does. vimpress is a |
| 58 |
> wordpress editing tool running in the vim editor. It connects to a |
| 59 |
> wordpress blog and let's you do the edits in vim instead of some |
| 60 |
> other editing tool. But you still need to have access to a wordpress |
| 61 |
> blog for it to work |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
And to get access to the blog, I need WordPress, right? |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
> Are you certain you need to run the wordpress software locally? |
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
No, I still have to ask... |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
> Will you not instead be editing a blog hosted elsewhere? |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
And if so, can I get with only vimpress instead? |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
Sorry, for may be stupid questions and thank you for answering. |
Archives