1 |
On Sat, 24 May 2014 02:19:19 -0400 |
2 |
covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Sorry, that one was wrong as well, here is the correct one which I |
5 |
> have tested myself! |
6 |
> https://covici.com/owncloud/public.php?service=files&t=7aa380dc7ff13da479331a425ce8a665 |
7 |
|
8 |
(TL;DR: Enable the COMPOSITE extension in your Xorg configuration.) |
9 |
|
10 |
Which version of GNOME is this? I run GNOME 3.12; if you still run |
11 |
a much older version of GNOME, you might want to consider an upgrade. |
12 |
|
13 |
Did a diff against mine. |
14 |
|
15 |
First bit where it goes wrong: |
16 |
|
17 |
gdm-session-worker[14085]: <7>AccountsService: Error calling |
18 |
GetAll() when retrieving properties |
19 |
for /org/freedesktop/Accounts/User105: Operation was cancelled |
20 |
gdm-session-worker[14085]: <7>AccountsService: Error calling |
21 |
GetAll() when retrieving properties |
22 |
for /org/freedesktop/Accounts/User105: Operation was cancelled |
23 |
|
24 |
Second bit where it goes wrong: |
25 |
|
26 |
/usr/bin/dbus-launch[14093]: gnome-session-is-accelerated: No |
27 |
composite extension. |
28 |
/usr/bin/dbus-launch[14093]: gnome-session-check-accelerated: |
29 |
Helper exited with code 256 |
30 |
/usr/bin/dbus-launch[14093]: gnome-session-is-accelerated: No |
31 |
composite extension. |
32 |
/usr/bin/dbus-launch[14093]: gnome-session-check-accelerated: |
33 |
Helper exited with code 256 |
34 |
/usr/bin/dbus-launch[14093]: ** (process:14093): WARNING **: |
35 |
software acceleration check failed: Child process exited with code |
36 |
1 |
37 |
|
38 |
The first one is accountsservice; here you can check if you have the |
39 |
last version (or try a different version), as well as see if the |
40 |
systemd USE flag on it is set. Though, don't worry too much; given that |
41 |
it goes further past this point, this might be a false positive. But it |
42 |
might be relevant might you experience another problem later on... |
43 |
|
44 |
The second one is way more interesting, it is a process that exits with |
45 |
code 1 and definitely is a failure; the lack of presence of a composite |
46 |
extension means that there is something wrong with your Xorg |
47 |
configuration or detection, maybe you have explicitly disabling it or |
48 |
have set it up in a way that it breaks. |
49 |
|
50 |
Alternatively consider to remove the existing Xorg configuration files, |
51 |
try again; if it still breaks, you can generate one with nvidia-xconfig. |
52 |
|
53 |
In my case I get ... |
54 |
|
55 |
gdm-Xorg-:0[2680]: Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE |
56 |
|
57 |
... which doesn't appear in your log. |
58 |
|
59 |
A similar forum topic seems to suggest it happens in such case: |
60 |
|
61 |
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-977526-start-0.html |
62 |
|
63 |
Thus can you try enabling that extension? |
64 |
|
65 |
-- |
66 |
With kind regards, |
67 |
|
68 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
69 |
Gentoo Developer |
70 |
|
71 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
72 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
73 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |