1 |
On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote: |
2 |
> > reiserfs has barriers turned on by default - which makes it a bit slower |
3 |
> > but a lot safer for data. ext3 has them turned off by default - ext3 devs |
4 |
> > don't care about data - only speed. You turn on barriers, performance |
5 |
> > goes down by 30%. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I read an article about that, and if I recall correctly the assumption |
8 |
> was that the likelihood of data loss occurring due to the barriers |
9 |
> issue was negligible. I have no expertise to decide on that matter, |
10 |
> but the fact that pretty much every linux distribution chooses ext3 by |
11 |
> default suggests it is the safest (at least for simple desktop/laptop |
12 |
> usage), no? |
13 |
|
14 |
fedora turns on 4k stack - well knowing that it kills xfs. Do you want to |
15 |
rephrase your question? |
16 |
|
17 |
> |
18 |
> Somewhat offtopic: |
19 |
> What do you suggest for me? I care about data safety, but am too lazy |
20 |
> to make frequent backups, so filesystem robustness and availability of |
21 |
> data recovery tools is pretty important; |
22 |
|
23 |
so use whatever you want, get a nice cheap dlt from ebay and let a cronjob |
24 |
write to it. No 'lazy' problem. Very secure. |