| 1 |
On 27 Jun 2006, at 22:25, kashani wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>> |
| 3 |
>>>> http://www.roundcube.net/ |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> Unfortunately after a nice release back in Feb the project is |
| 6 |
>>> looking like it's dead in the water. |
| 7 |
>> What makes you say that? The changelog seems to suggest activity. |
| 8 |
>> http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/wiki/Changelog |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The forums were down for a month while CVS up and disappeared. |
| 11 |
> Looks like they were transitioning to SVN which makes me feel |
| 12 |
> better, but almost five months without a release doesn't thrill me |
| 13 |
> especially when there are so many things that could be worked on. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'm not _immensely_ fussed about releases if I can get an up-to-date |
| 16 |
version from SVN in the meantime. If a developer has to choose a |
| 17 |
priority between bug-fixing & releases I can sympathise with a choice |
| 18 |
to fix bugs or add features. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> The changelog isn't very impressive either IMHO. I'd rather see |
| 21 |
> features like global address books being worked on rather than what |
| 22 |
> I interpret to be mostly cosmetic changes. YMMV. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
You obviously have hands-on experience with RoundCube, which I don't. |
| 25 |
How are addressbooks implemented at the moment? I would prefer to see |
| 26 |
then access an LDAP directory. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Stroller. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives