1 |
On 12/04/2016 22:31, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 10:18:50 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
>> On 12/04/2016 22:01, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:31:28 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
5 |
>>>>> I have ksnapshot in @world, so depclean didn't touch it. It |
6 |
>>>>> still works fine. Spectacle and ksnapshot block each other, but if |
7 |
>>>>> you unmerge spectacle you may be able to get a working ksnapshot |
8 |
>>>>> back, at least for now. |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> I know, had to copy a meta-ebuild ( kdegraphics-meta ) into my local |
11 |
>>>> overlay and modify it to pick ksnapshot though. As the later version |
12 |
>>>> only allows Spectacle. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> I don't use the meta packages, preferring to define my own set with the |
15 |
>>> packages I want, so I wasn't aware of Spectacle. I've just tried it an is |
16 |
>>> seems to do much the same as ksnapshot, just with a lot more white space |
17 |
>>> in the UI - but WTF do they block one another, they're only screen shot |
18 |
>>> programs? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> There doesn't seem to be a good technical reason, maybe it's as simple |
21 |
>> as the maintainer thought there shouldn't be two competing apps with the |
22 |
>> same functionality? |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> I unblocked them here, and re-emerged both. Nothing extra was pulled in, |
25 |
>> so there are no conflicting libs. |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> Unfortunately I can't attach a screenshot as proof - both remove their |
28 |
>> own window to do the capture :-) |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Find a 3rd one to do it with. |
31 |
> Or take a picture with a mobile phone? :) |
32 |
|
33 |
I considered that, then I remembered that I'm a lazy sod, so I didn't! |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Alan McKinnon |
38 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |