| 1 |
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 10:18:50 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/04/2016 22:01, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:31:28 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>> I have ksnapshot in @world, so depclean didn't touch it. It |
| 5 |
> >>> still works fine. Spectacle and ksnapshot block each other, but if |
| 6 |
> >>> you unmerge spectacle you may be able to get a working ksnapshot |
| 7 |
> >>> back, at least for now. |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> I know, had to copy a meta-ebuild ( kdegraphics-meta ) into my local |
| 10 |
> >> overlay and modify it to pick ksnapshot though. As the later version |
| 11 |
> >> only allows Spectacle. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I don't use the meta packages, preferring to define my own set with the |
| 14 |
> > packages I want, so I wasn't aware of Spectacle. I've just tried it an is |
| 15 |
> > seems to do much the same as ksnapshot, just with a lot more white space |
| 16 |
> > in the UI - but WTF do they block one another, they're only screen shot |
| 17 |
> > programs? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> There doesn't seem to be a good technical reason, maybe it's as simple |
| 20 |
> as the maintainer thought there shouldn't be two competing apps with the |
| 21 |
> same functionality? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I unblocked them here, and re-emerged both. Nothing extra was pulled in, |
| 24 |
> so there are no conflicting libs. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Unfortunately I can't attach a screenshot as proof - both remove their |
| 27 |
> own window to do the capture :-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Find a 3rd one to do it with. |
| 30 |
Or take a picture with a mobile phone? :) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Joost |
Archives