| 1 |
On Friday 29 December 2006 18:50, Mark M wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/29/06, Grant Edwards <grante@××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 2006-12-29, Mark M <makalsky@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > how about media-sound/audacious ? |
| 5 |
> > > its a nice and lightweight player. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Lightweight?? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a |
| 10 |
> > virtial set size of 58M and resident set size of 14M. The only |
| 11 |
> > thing with a slightly larger resident size is the X server. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Audacious takes three times as much memory as Apache. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND |
| 16 |
10124 michael 15 0 113m 30m 22m R 0.5 4.9 0:02.38 amarokapp |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
and that's when it's not playing anything! When streaming the %CPU goes up to |
| 19 |
8.5-9.0. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'm missing xmms too. I hope xmms2 will eventually be developed enough to use |
| 22 |
as a stable package, but without the bloatware that winamp has become. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Mick |
Archives