[gentoo-user] Re: I want my xmms

[Grant Edwards]

On 2006-12-29, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:

>>>> how about media-sound/audacious ?
>>>> its a nice and lightweight player.
>>>
>>> Lightweight??
>>>
>>> It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a
>>> virtial set size of 58M and resident set size of 14M.  The only
>>> thing with a slightly larger resident size is the X server.
>>>
>>> Audacious takes three times as much memory as Apache.
>
> PID   USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
> 10124 michael   15   0  113m  30m  22m R  0.5  4.9   0:02.38 amarokapp

Damn.  Compared to that, I guess audacious is lightweight.  I
probably need to re-calibrate my "weight-meter".

> and that's when it's not playing anything!  When streaming the
> %CPU goes up to 8.5-9.0.
>
> I'm missing xmms too.  I hope xmms2 will eventually be
> developed enough to use as a stable package, but without the
> bloatware that winamp has become.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  Should I get
                                  at               locked in the PRINCICAL'S
                               visi.com            OFFICE today -- or have
                                                   a VASECTOMY??

-- 
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list