| 1 |
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 13:55, Thierry de Coulon |
| 2 |
<tcoulon@××××××××.ch> wrote about '[gentoo-user] What happens with masked |
| 3 |
packages?': |
| 4 |
> I'm running an amd64 Gentoo (but this is not a specific amd64 question) |
| 5 |
> and have installed a few ~amd64 masked packages - and some work amzingly |
| 6 |
> well. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Glad to hear it. I run entirely ~amd64 on my desktop and things work like |
| 9 |
a charm. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> So I googled for information as to where I might report success, so that |
| 12 |
> they might be unmasked, but didn't find that info. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
No need to report success. If the maintainer is happy with the ebuild and |
| 15 |
there are no bugs filed for 30 days (or is it 90?) the package will be |
| 16 |
moved from testing (~arch) to stable (arch). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Remember that these keywords are (generally) for the ebuild, and doesn't |
| 19 |
indicate how well the product provided by upstream works. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. |
| 23 |
bss03@××××××××××.com |
| 24 |
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives