| 1 |
On 2016-07-01 15:02 +0100, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Surely if there’s an ebuild in the tree, yet it needs patching, you |
| 4 |
> should be filing a bug to get the patch included. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Even the patch is so horribly ugly that I cannot bring myself to do |
| 7 |
this. The program has a hardcoded list of bitmap fonts, and the |
| 8 |
particular fonts make it unusable on my huge screen; my patch replaces |
| 9 |
the list with other bitmap fonts, equally hardcoded but suitable for my |
| 10 |
environment. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I really doubt that such a patch would be accepted. Or any patch, in |
| 13 |
fact; I half expect that the response would be "Why don't you just use |
| 14 |
the nice java-based cgoban2?" |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. |
| 18 |
Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? |
Archives