| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:42:36AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> nope, you just believed all the FUD there has been out there. |
| 4 |
> i've said it many times, and i'll say it again: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> the only real different is USE="rule-generator" and that's it |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> and sys-fs/eudev is constantly out of date and haven't developed any |
| 9 |
> features of their own |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
udev, the red-headed stepchild of systemd, hasn't exactly had a lot of |
| 12 |
new features, either. The following "FUD" brought to you by |
| 13 |
"Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc." http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Well, we intent to continue to make it possible to run udevd outside |
| 16 |
> of systemd. But that's about it. We will not polish that, or add |
| 17 |
> new features to that or anything. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> OTOH we do polish behaviour of udev when used *within* systemd |
| 20 |
> however, and that's our primary focus. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> And what we will certainly not do is compromise the uniform |
| 23 |
> integration into systemd for some cosmetic improvements for |
| 24 |
> non-systemd systems. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Straight from the horse's mouth, udev won't be getting new features |
| 27 |
and the systemd maintainers' main target is integration into systemd. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 31 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
Archives