| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:43 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine |
| 2 |
thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Very last comment here: |
| 5 |
> > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759 |
| 6 |
> > (ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants) |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Per your initial post, you have: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > [ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0 USE="nls -doc -static-libs" 0 kB [0] |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > I'm certain you forgot to unmask eeze when it first hit the overlay |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Yes! That was it! |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I had unmasked it on the first machine, but not the second. I am confused |
| 22 |
> though, shouldn't it come back and tell me that ezee was required as a |
| 23 |
> dependency and it was masked? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
There's a bug in the ebuild: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
$ equery depends eeze |
| 28 |
* These packages depend on eeze: |
| 29 |
x11-wm/enlightenment-9999 (udev ? dev-libs/eeze) |
| 30 |
(!hal ? dev-libs/eeze) |
| 31 |
$ |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
All other deps for efl packages specifically state version -9999 except this |
| 34 |
one. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
eeze is part of EFL and released as 1.0.0, so that dep is satisfied. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
> Thank you very much! :) |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> PS. You didn't say if icons for USB sticks disappear from your desktop |
| 41 |
> when you unplug them. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Haven't used e17 much lately and almost never use icons on the desktop |
| 44 |
(mount/umount in an xterm instead - old habit). But the google search that |
| 45 |
found the thread above also found something that automounting was done by hal |
| 46 |
in the past, that ehal is e17 code to interface with hal and it is |
| 47 |
enabled/disabled at run time using detection routines. Plus a few other |
| 48 |
snippets of info that led me to believe autodetection of devices doesn't work |
| 49 |
reliably at this time without hal. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives