| 1 |
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 23:46:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did |
| 3 |
> opine |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> thusly: |
| 6 |
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > opine thusly: |
| 10 |
> > > > On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 11 |
> > > I compared by USE to yours and they are much the same apart from ofono |
| 12 |
> > > (not relevant) and I have ukit enabled. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > You are running x86 (32 bit) right? |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Yes, this is a x86 mostly stable box (except for e17 of course). |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Ha! I believe we found the little fucker causing you grief. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Very last comment here: |
| 21 |
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759 |
| 22 |
> (ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Per your initial post, you have: |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> [ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0 USE="nls -doc -static-libs" 0 kB [0] |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I'm certain you forgot to unmask eeze when it first hit the overlay |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Yes! That was it! |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I had unmasked it on the first machine, but not the second. I am confused |
| 33 |
though, shouldn't it come back and tell me that ezee was required as a |
| 34 |
dependency and it was masked? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Thank you very much! :) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
PS. You didn't say if icons for USB sticks disappear from your desktop when |
| 39 |
you unplug them. |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Regards, |
| 42 |
Mick |
Archives