| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine |
| 2 |
thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > opine thusly: |
| 8 |
> > > On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > I compared by USE to yours and they are much the same apart from ofono |
| 10 |
> > (not relevant) and I have ukit enabled. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > You are running x86 (32 bit) right? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Yes, this is a x86 mostly stable box (except for e17 of course). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ha! I believe we found the little fucker causing you grief. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Very last comment here: |
| 19 |
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759 |
| 20 |
(ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Per your initial post, you have: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0 USE="nls -doc -static-libs" 0 kB [0] |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'm certain you forgot to unmask eeze when it first hit the overlay |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives