Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Willie Wong <wwong@×××××××××.EDU>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ls date was: Bizarre etc/cfg-update problem
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 22:18:22
Message-Id: 20060107221404.GA1620@princeton.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ls date was: Bizarre etc/cfg-update problem by "Mariusz Pękala"
1 On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Penguin Lover Mariusz P?kala squawked:
2 > info ls, section * Formatting file timestamps::
3 > " A timestamp is considered to be "recent" if it is less than six
4 > months old, and is not dated in the future."
5 >
6 > and further:
7 > " For example, `--time-style="+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"' causes..."
8 >
9 > HTH
10 >
11
12 grrr... curse gnu info. For some reason I *never* remember to look
13 there. Now, if only fvwm has a easily navigable info page instead of
14 the big man page...
15
16 W
17 --
18 "Ford grabbed him by the lapels of his dressing gown and
19 spoke to him as slowly and distinctly and patiently as if
20 he were somebody from a telephone company accounts
21 department."
22
23 - Ford trying to rectify that situation.
24 Sortir en Pantoufles: up 56 days, 14:29
25 --
26 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list