| 1 |
Le 2015-08-30 12:41, wraeth a écrit : |
| 2 |
>> I wonder if there is some advantage to leaving things as my |
| 3 |
>> installation has created them or should I revert to the old way |
| 4 |
>> where package.use is file... not a directory. |
| 5 |
> There's no specific advantage to using separate files within a |
| 6 |
> directory to using a single monolithic file other than manageability |
| 7 |
> and some utilities, as far as I'm aware. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
I think that having separate directories makes things much easier to manage when your system divert in major ways from the official ones. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For example in my ARM (and soon MIPS on the Creator) linux I want the mate desktop but not all packages have been tested and approved so I need a lot of entries to get them to compile. I do not want an entirely unstable system so I start with the stable |
| 12 |
one and customize, only using package that I consider stable enough for my use. Having multiple files makes my life easier. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Even if you do not need this kind of stuff it can still be usefull, why cram everything in one file! |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Michel |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
For Linux Software visit |
| 20 |
http://home.comcast.net/~mcatudal |
| 21 |
http://sourceforge.net/projects/suzielinux/ |
Archives