Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:44:44
Message-Id: 57877b1e.89d3190a.5b6b1.3609@mx.google.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker? by Marc Joliet
1 On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:52:41 +0200 Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> wrote:
2
3 > On Thursday 14 July 2016 08:17:19 Alan McKinnon wrote:
4 > > -N is newuse, portage also considers packages whose USE has changed.
5 > > -t is emptytree, portage also considers the entire tree and -u tells it
6 > > to not remerge things that don't need updating.
7 >
8 > Um, -e is --emptytree, no? -t is just --tree. But yeah, according to his
9 > first email, James did leave out -N the second time around ("emerge -uvDNp
10 > world" vs. "emerge -uDtv @world").
11
12 Sorry for the interrupting a big gurus, but in my humble opinion
13 the reason why there was no compilation while running emerge for
14 the first time is the -p option (pretend).

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker? Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker? Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de>