| 1 |
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:43:54 +0300, Gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:52:41 +0200 Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On Thursday 14 July 2016 08:17:19 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > -N is newuse, portage also considers packages whose USE has changed. |
| 6 |
> > > -t is emptytree, portage also considers the entire tree and -u tells it |
| 7 |
> > > to not remerge things that don't need updating. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Um, -e is --emptytree, no? -t is just --tree. But yeah, according to his |
| 10 |
> > first email, James did leave out -N the second time around ("emerge -uvDNp |
| 11 |
> > world" vs. "emerge -uDtv @world"). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Sorry for the interrupting a big gurus, but in my humble opinion |
| 14 |
> the reason why there was no compilation while running emerge for |
| 15 |
> the first time is the -p option (pretend). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
No, even without -p the first command wouldn't have done anything, because "Total: 0 packages". |
| 18 |
There simple was nothing to do! The second command showed "3 Packages". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
-- |
Archives