1 |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
4 |
> <SNIP> |
5 |
>>> If you want real performance from SSD, you ditch SATA altogether and use |
6 |
>>> a drive on a dedicated card. Of course, you're talking real money now. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Um. I'm pretty sure he's already getting 'real' performance from that |
9 |
>> SSD, even a "mere" 200MB/s runs circles around my best set of platters |
10 |
>> at home. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Real performance being the combination of drive and controller. This |
13 |
> particular drive was spec'ed out at 500MB/S which is consistent with |
14 |
> what the drive did in that link I pointed at earlier this morning. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I do think now that 200MB/S is about the most I'm going to get from a |
17 |
> 1 lane PCIe type adapter. I suspect that the biggest reason the link |
18 |
> you pointed me toward at NewEgg is spec'ed at 1GB/S is due to it being |
19 |
> a 4 lane card? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Anyway, thanks for the pointer. |
22 |
|
23 |
I linked to a category of products; Internal SSDs which directly |
24 |
connect via PCIe. Currently 27 listings in that category. Lots of neat |
25 |
stuff. |
26 |
|
27 |
As for systemic performance...I'm certain your controller being only |
28 |
one PCIe lane is a major limiting factor. Beyond that, there are a lot |
29 |
of factors which weigh into SSD performance...which at least a few |
30 |
people in here (such as Neil) can tell you about. I only know things |
31 |
like SLC is often faster than MLC, that the on-drive controller's |
32 |
properties can have a major impact, and that SSDs are mostly awesome |
33 |
due to low latency. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
:wq |