| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
<SNIP> |
| 4 |
>> If you want real performance from SSD, you ditch SATA altogether and use |
| 5 |
>> a drive on a dedicated card. Of course, you're talking real money now. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Um. I'm pretty sure he's already getting 'real' performance from that |
| 8 |
> SSD, even a "mere" 200MB/s runs circles around my best set of platters |
| 9 |
> at home. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> -- |
| 12 |
> :wq |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Real performance being the combination of drive and controller. This |
| 16 |
particular drive was spec'ed out at 500MB/S which is consistent with |
| 17 |
what the drive did in that link I pointed at earlier this morning. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I do think now that 200MB/S is about the most I'm going to get from a |
| 20 |
1 lane PCIe type adapter. I suspect that the biggest reason the link |
| 21 |
you pointed me toward at NewEgg is spec'ed at 1GB/S is due to it being |
| 22 |
a 4 lane card? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Anyway, thanks for the pointer. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Cheers, |
| 27 |
Mark |
Archives