Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 00:39:32
Message-Id: ea3e8967-807b-3791-d46f-63b8a89e837f@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay? by Grant Taylor
1 On 01/19/2018 05:30 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
2 > I'm trying to juggle the various pieces as I understand them to see if
3 > everything can work together.
4
5 I have a fleeting thought that /might/ work. I want to write it down
6 before I loose it.
7
8 1) Configure Sendmail's MTA to not have any listening daemon ports. -
9 This means that all interface to the MTA will be via the
10 /path/to/sendmail binary.
11 2) Configure Sendmail's MSA to listen on TCP port 25.
12 3) Configure Sendmail's MSA to smart host (without encryption) through
13 your existing SMTP to Exchange gateway.
14
15 I /think/ this addresses most parts.
16
17 SMTP from ??? connects to the MSA which connects to the Exchange Gateway
18 which connects to Exchange via something other than SMTP. - I think
19 that tracks.
20
21 Email from the local machine uses the /usr/sbin/sendmail interface which
22 speaks SMTP to the world or a smart host.
23
24 I think that does work. Granted, there are some IPs and or ports to
25 juggle to make sure that Sendmail's MSA and your SMTP to Exchange
26 gateway don't conflict. But I think that should be possible to handle.
27
28 I don't know if the other common MTAs can do anything like this or not.
29 I would hope that they can.
30
31 I will also say that it is possible to get Sendmail to do some really
32 complex things. It may be possible to get a single sendmail daemon to
33 do everything. But I think that is going to be more complicated,
34 possibly needlessly so if the above recommendation works.
35
36 I need to know more details about the different accounts and how they
37 interact with msmtp (which I have zero experience with) to know if they
38 will play nicely with the above configuration.
39
40 The only niggling feeling I have is about 127.0.0.1:25. Is anything at
41 all using that? I've run across a lot of programs that assume the local
42 MTA is listening there. - If something is, then it's likely a matter
43 of juggling IP(s) and port(s) that various things are listening on.
44
45
46
47 --
48 Grant. . . .
49 unix || die

Attachments

File name MIME type
smime.p7s application/pkcs7-signature