Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:35:57
Message-Id: b8a13138-aa97-858a-f0dc-91a378e86a2f@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by Caveman Al Toraboran
1 On 4/22/20 11:22 AM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
2 > On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 11:01 PM, Consus <consus@××××.net> wrote:
3 >
4 >> Yeah, mgorny likes to do some provocative stuff like forking Portage.
5 >
6 > patching P*****E is heretic, and forking it is
7 > outright blasphemous.
8 >
9
10 For everyone complaining about how long emerge @world takes, and about
11 the incomprehensible error messages -- this fork was a step towards
12 fixing that. Portage does some slow, unpredictable, undocumented magic
13 when resolving dependencies that it never should have done in the first
14 place. Developers using portage then make commits that appear to work
15 with portage, but won't work in any other PMS-compliant package manager,
16 and often don't work in portage itself when given slightly different
17 command-line options.
18
19 Portage was forked because the current maintainers insist on leaving it
20 broken to "avoid the phone calls." There are still problems, but this
21 way people don't realize they're portage's fault.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? Caveman Al Toraboran <toraboracaveman@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>