1 |
Paul Hartman wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Thinking about it, I got 16Gbs on here. That could take a while to test. |
5 |
>> O_O |
6 |
>> |
7 |
> When I'm in a hurry I just run test 5, it seems that 99% of the time |
8 |
> that's the test that finds errors anyway. Best, of course, is to run |
9 |
> them all, but I usually do test 5 only first since it's more likely to |
10 |
> fail sooner and can do passes faster. :) Then if it does NOT fail I'll |
11 |
> run all tests, just to be sure. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
I didn't know that. I'll start with it then let it run at least a |
17 |
couple passes of a full test. I got some good ram so I sort of think it |
18 |
is OK. I really think the power failure the other day messed up |
19 |
something, drive itself, some file or something that is causing this. I |
20 |
just get the sense there is a snowball coming tho. |
21 |
|
22 |
My current plan, finish this new install. Test the ram and hope it is |
23 |
OK. Test the new install and see if it holds up. If it does, I plan to |
24 |
test the heck out of the old drive. If it passes tests then I may copy |
25 |
my install over and test it again. If it fails, door stop most likely. |
26 |
Are they even worth shipping back anymore? It may not even be under |
27 |
warranty now tho. It's about a year old. |
28 |
|
29 |
I'm just hoping for a fix SOON. |
30 |
|
31 |
Dale |
32 |
|
33 |
:-) :-) |