1 |
----- Original Message ---- |
2 |
|
3 |
> From: Zeerak Waseem <zeerak.w@×××××.com> |
4 |
> But then the question isn't whether there are a number of soft dependencies, but |
5 |
> in the case of semantic-desktop whether -it- is a soft dependency. Like |
6 |
> previously stated, I don't use kmail, nor do I intend to (I at least think I |
7 |
> mentioned it). This is just my take on the matter of whether it is truly |
8 |
> necessary, or even a good idea to have symantic-desktop as a hard dependency. |
9 |
|
10 |
So you are complaining why? Why even install KMail if you are not going to use it? |
11 |
|
12 |
> And as stated, this is not in the light of a full blown KDE env, but mainly in |
13 |
> considerations to when you're using another window manager. Be it icewm, jwm, |
14 |
> openbox or whatever. Should something that is an integrated part of the KDE |
15 |
> desktop environment be forced on those that don't use KDE? |
16 |
|
17 |
The KDE devs in general (applications, etc.) with the exception of KOffice, and possibly Amarok, are all targeting their development as an integrated DE meant to be run under KDE. |
18 |
They have been pretty clear as well that they do not intend the applications to be run stand-alone under other DE's (even Gnome) - that's not officially supported. |
19 |
And this has been especially clear for KDE4 (see asiego's blog for example). |
20 |
|
21 |
> Our opinions on this matter obviously differ, and for that simple reason I find |
22 |
> it interesting to find out -why- you think it's okay that they're being forced. |
23 |
> And simply stating that the devs' decided that it was how it was done, is pretty |
24 |
> much as nonconstructive argument as "dbus is bad because it's new". I'd like to |
25 |
> find out why you seem to disagree, so please. By all means, enlighten me :-) (I |
26 |
> am asking for it after all ;)) |
27 |
|
28 |
If you disagree with the devs lack of support for things beyond their requirements, or things that they explicitly have stated they do not support that is your issue. |
29 |
The fact is the devs are building the application for the target environment - KDE4 - and no other DE (e.g. gnome, icewm, jwm, openbox, etc.). |
30 |
So expect that dependencies will match what would be expected in that environment if you want to use the application. |
31 |
Anything else is unreasonable of you as a user. |
32 |
|
33 |
A simple analogy: The Chevy Malibu part not fitting in the Ford F150 vehicle. Sure, they may perform the same function in the end, but they were designed for completely different vehicles. |
34 |
|
35 |
Ben |