1 |
Galevsky ha scritto: |
2 |
> On Jan 13, 2008 8:24 PM, Michael Schmarck |
3 |
> <michael.schmarck@×××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
>>>> So I'd rather say, that it would be better, if there were no install |
5 |
>>>> CD at all. |
6 |
>>> But it can be done. |
7 |
>> It's not worth the effort, though, as far as I'm concerned. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Since your are not concerned about releasing them, you should find no |
10 |
> issue to let others do it. It is the community spirit, when folks add |
11 |
> a new way to do something, just enlarging the panel of possibilities |
12 |
> without negative impact on existing solutions, even if it doesn't suit |
13 |
> your own needs, since you still have the possibility to setup your |
14 |
> system by the older way, there is no reason to prevent motivated |
15 |
> people from implementing their alternative solution. |
16 |
|
17 |
Of course there is no reason to prevent people to implement new |
18 |
solutions. New solutions are always welcome: this is what open source is |
19 |
for. :) |
20 |
|
21 |
However, I personally think it's a waste of time, and it could possibly |
22 |
put unnecessary blame on Gentoo. And you are the living proof of it. |
23 |
|
24 |
Let me explain. You began complaining because the Gentoo live cd |
25 |
*exists*, but it is out of date and didn't support your hardware. It's a |
26 |
reasonable complain in the assumption you need the Gentoo cd (and you |
27 |
can't do with anything else): you of course want your hardware to be |
28 |
supported by the medium installation. |
29 |
|
30 |
Now, imagine the official Gentoo live cd *never existed*. You probably |
31 |
just would have picked up some cd you knew supported your system (say, |
32 |
latest Ubuntu) and installed using that. No complaining, no discussions, |
33 |
everyone happy. |
34 |
|
35 |
See? Having the Gentoo live cd *was wrong from the beginning*. It put |
36 |
another fairly complex piece of software to support on developer |
37 |
shoulders, offered vanishingly little benefit, and when it fails it |
38 |
immediately puts blame on Gentoo: "hey this cd doesn't support my |
39 |
hardware, wtf" that can offset potential users. |
40 |
|
41 |
The reason other distro have complex live cds for installing is that |
42 |
they *need that*. Gentoo does not need this additional complexity. |
43 |
Nevertheless a live cd there was, but as you experienced, it's more the |
44 |
trouble it causes than that it solves. |
45 |
|
46 |
And not having a live cd on which Gentoo is obliged to depend is not a |
47 |
bug: sir, it's a feature! The live cd didn't support my Macbook Pro |
48 |
networking. Well, fine: Kubuntu did. I had a Kubuntu 7.10 cd around, |
49 |
booted from that, no hassle at all. Other distros have to support their |
50 |
own live cd, and if it fails, installation is impossible. With Gentoo, |
51 |
we have the full monty of live cds to choose within. It's like a distro |
52 |
with infinite installers. |
53 |
|
54 |
You are free to create a live cd for Gentoo install, but you're doing |
55 |
nothing new nor particularly useful. You'll just add one to the list. Why? |
56 |
|
57 |
m. |
58 |
-- |
59 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |