| 1 |
from http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-kernel/openvz-sources, i see that |
| 2 |
openvz-sources-2.6.27.6.1 is already the latest stable version, and |
| 3 |
the other 2 newer versions are hard masked. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
does anybody know how stable these masked version are? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Kyle Bader <kyle.bader@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
> Ext4 was very new around 2.6.27,. The kenel is likely refusing to |
| 10 |
> mount the filesystem because the kernel driver is experimental (old) |
| 11 |
> and the filesystem was created when a different kernel was loaded (non |
| 12 |
> experimental ext4). Using the old driver could compromise the |
| 13 |
> integrity so the kernel refuses. You might have better luck with a |
| 14 |
> more recent kernel. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> On 7/15/10, Xi Shen <davidshen84@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 17 |
>> sure, i do not need ext4dev, i want to use ext4 only. but i did not |
| 18 |
>> find a compile option for ext4, i only find a option for ext4dev/ext4. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> the openvz i emerged is 2.6.27.6.1, which is the latest stable |
| 21 |
>> version. is it too old? should i try newer unstable version? |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org> |
| 25 |
>> wrote: |
| 26 |
>>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 19:34 +0800, Xi Shen wrote: |
| 27 |
>>>> i emerged the openvz kernel, and compiled the kernel with ext4dev/ext4 |
| 28 |
>>>> file system support. but when i tried to boot my system, i got a |
| 29 |
>>>> kernel panic. it says cannot mount my ext4 root, because it is not |
| 30 |
>>>> marked ok to use with test code. |
| 31 |
>>>> |
| 32 |
>>>> my root is at a ext4 file system, and i think the ext4dev/ext4 kernel |
| 33 |
>>>> compile option would allow me to use both ext4 and ext4dev features, |
| 34 |
>>>> am i wrong? |
| 35 |
>>>> |
| 36 |
>>>> i do not want to use ext4dev on my root, neither do i want to |
| 37 |
>>>> downgrade to ext3. is there a way to fix this? |
| 38 |
>>> |
| 39 |
>>> You don't need ext4dev. ext4dev is old and, unless you've used it |
| 40 |
>>> before, there's no need to use it today. I'm guessing that's giving you |
| 41 |
>>> that error (that's an old error). It's easy to fix though (do a Google |
| 42 |
>>> search for the error). But it should not even occur if you've never |
| 43 |
>>> used ext4dev, IIRC. |
| 44 |
>>> |
| 45 |
>>> -a |
| 46 |
>>> |
| 47 |
>>> |
| 48 |
>>> |
| 49 |
>>> |
| 50 |
>> |
| 51 |
>> |
| 52 |
>> |
| 53 |
>> -- |
| 54 |
>> Best Regards, |
| 55 |
>> Xi Shen (David) |
| 56 |
>> |
| 57 |
>> http://twitter.com/davidshen84/ |
| 58 |
>> |
| 59 |
>> |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> -- |
| 62 |
> Sent from my mobile device |
| 63 |
> |
| 64 |
> |
| 65 |
> Kyle |
| 66 |
> |
| 67 |
> |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-- |
| 72 |
Best Regards, |
| 73 |
Xi Shen (David) |
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
http://twitter.com/davidshen84/ |
Archives