Archives
Archives
| From: | Thufir <hawat.thufir@×××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is Gentoo Healthy? (The Return) |
| Date: | Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:47:06 |
| Message-Id: | f6iajq$1gr$6@sea.gmane.org |
| 1 | On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:40:10 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Try doing that with |
| 4 | > RPMs. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Generally, works fine with YUM. I expect that yum and portage are about |
| 7 | the same, and end result differences on dependencies are more due redhat/ |
| 8 | fedora using multiple "repo's" for liability/policy reasons, not due to |
| 9 | the superiority of portage over yum. My two cents. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -Thufir |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is Gentoo Healthy? (The Return) | David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com> |