Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:33:58
Message-Id: 4F55E7A8.9040803@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] rng-tools by Michael Mol
1 Hello Michael,
2
3
4 On 03/03/2012 02:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
5 > The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is
6 > '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique
7 > to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date?
8
9 Yes, version 2-unofficial-mt.14* is a Debian fork. Quoting from its
10 README file:
11
12 rng-tools, unofficial Debian fork
13 =================================
14
15 NOTICE:
16 This is an unofficial version of rng-tools with a lot of added
17 functionality and bugs, for which I assume total blame. Don't bother
18 rng-tools upstream with problems you find in this version of
19 rng-tools.
20
21 rng-tools unofficial-mt is a living reminder to myself to not modify
22 upstream code without sending the changes upstream at every step.
23 Suddenly, you have a mass of changes too big to send upstream, and
24 yet you find yourself without the energy to break them into smallish
25 patches to submit upstream (i.e. to "unfork").
26
27 [..]
28
29 If you would rather use Debian's version in Gentoo, give
30
31 sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14
32
33 a try, which I have just added to overlay betagarden:
34
35 # layman -a betagarden
36 # emerge =sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14
37
38 If you would like to see features from Debian's fork in rng-tools 3.x
39 and beyond, please step up and help rng-tools' upstream integrate
40 Debian's changes.
41
42 Best,
43
44
45
46 Sebastian

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>