1 |
Hello Michael, |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On 03/03/2012 02:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote: |
5 |
> The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is |
6 |
> '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique |
7 |
> to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date? |
8 |
|
9 |
Yes, version 2-unofficial-mt.14* is a Debian fork. Quoting from its |
10 |
README file: |
11 |
|
12 |
rng-tools, unofficial Debian fork |
13 |
================================= |
14 |
|
15 |
NOTICE: |
16 |
This is an unofficial version of rng-tools with a lot of added |
17 |
functionality and bugs, for which I assume total blame. Don't bother |
18 |
rng-tools upstream with problems you find in this version of |
19 |
rng-tools. |
20 |
|
21 |
rng-tools unofficial-mt is a living reminder to myself to not modify |
22 |
upstream code without sending the changes upstream at every step. |
23 |
Suddenly, you have a mass of changes too big to send upstream, and |
24 |
yet you find yourself without the energy to break them into smallish |
25 |
patches to submit upstream (i.e. to "unfork"). |
26 |
|
27 |
[..] |
28 |
|
29 |
If you would rather use Debian's version in Gentoo, give |
30 |
|
31 |
sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14 |
32 |
|
33 |
a try, which I have just added to overlay betagarden: |
34 |
|
35 |
# layman -a betagarden |
36 |
# emerge =sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14 |
37 |
|
38 |
If you would like to see features from Debian's fork in rng-tools 3.x |
39 |
and beyond, please step up and help rng-tools' upstream integrate |
40 |
Debian's changes. |
41 |
|
42 |
Best, |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
Sebastian |