Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:09:21
Message-Id: 20080118000851.4c06eefa@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage by "Bo Ørsted Andresen"
1 On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:41:04 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
2
3 > Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are
4 > now the default which means they are listed first in any-of dependency
5 > blocks such as e.g. || ( kde-base/kompare:kde-4 kde-base/kdesdk:kde-4 )
6 > in KDE 4. But monos are still around. There is a list of the monos in
7 > the url I posted in another mail to this thread.
8
9 Would it be possible to modify the kde-meta eclass so that a split vs
10 monolithic block gave a more informative error message. Even a generic
11 message pointing to that URI would be a great help.
12
13
14 --
15 Neil Bothwick
16
17 Daisy Duke shorts would never go out of fashion.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>