Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 03:26:15
Message-Id: CAOTuDKoK0vk_8SLkUi-B=xEorU1fMy3Hxwc_CSM531j-vv+G4Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails by Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
1 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2 <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> wrote:
3 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
4 > Hash: SHA1
5 >
6 > On 17.05.2012 22:13, Michael Scherer wrote:
7 >
8 >>
9 >> 1) make output:
10 >>
11 >> CHK     include/linux/version.h CHK
12 >> include/generated/utsrelease.h CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK
13 >> include/generated/compile.h LD      init/mounts.o ls -Al -m
14 >> elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
15 >> init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
16 >> make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1 make: *** [init] Error 2
17 >>
18 >> There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message.
19 >>
20 >
21 >>
22 >> contains a directive to build mounts.o, see second last line, but
23 >> it for some reason this is ignored. Maybe there is a flaw in that
24 >> command, only I can't find it.
25 >>
26 >> regards, michael
27 >>
28 >>
29 >
30 > Have you tried a make clean on your sourcetree?
31 >
32 > CHK     include/linux/version.h
33 >
34 > IS for me one of the first lines I get at all. It seems strange to me
35 > that you get a call to the linker (LD) before even a call to the
36 > compiler (CC).
37 >
38 > I'd suggest you try a make clean first and try to build again
39 > afterwards (with -j1 or without a statement for jobs) to rule out race
40 > conditions.
41 >
42 > If that doesn't help, move your kernel sources to another directory
43 > and reemerge the sources. Copy your .config (ideally one of a working
44 > tree) and try again. If that doesn't help, try to get a working
45 > default config (like from /proc/config.gz from a live distro).
46 >
47 > WKR
48 >
49 > Hinnerk
50 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
51 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
52 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
53 >
54 > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPtWSXAAoJEJwwOFaNFkYc8tAH/iV59mb5MsH0pJ28dXUqe0X6
55 > tcbKB18vIQYmjG9gecGX4lVtgXCIhTqVeHEKbQVN4xRMo9u7D7FxygHtRY7sfYrk
56 > dvR9fs4RfIoykVeCF/0uVSNZnoXhixarYtr8FGvIKCxvUJnY/ws4W+k5tP8Ju8lJ
57 > wM5ldQ/eD8H4vFm4fIStQheTGERZlueNBVf77cLx8K/8p0XBvVM85V/epg+fC4I4
58 > bfWG1JtXrh1MUmaE+Y26aNOXGkUZiHax49CBiOUQLZNjk6f5idGppWV03HTL4mCV
59 > +dI6lNaUqU0AhnoG3yIOK8lY4kFu3QmNw4h1r+OCctASMJe8dUOTnF53TjJzYQk=
60 > =TguL
61 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
62 >
63
64 I'd be more active and vocal in trying to help sort this out, but it's
65 been a busy week since the 1k mile trip to get a car and working on
66 getting it into the shape I want it in... that aside, I *did* manage
67 to, without any changes, drop in the config provided at the start of
68 all this into a gentoo-sources 3.2.12 tree (after a quick mrproper)
69 and it built without issues. To me, that indicates that the toolchain,
70 particular copy of the sources, or hardware have an issue. That the
71 problem is as consistent as it is while the rest of the system isn't
72 failing in horrifying ways implies it's not the hardware. The
73 resulting modules and kernel from my building it can be grabbed from
74 http://poisonbl.freeshell.org/3.2.12_test.tar.bz2
75
76 --
77 Poison [BLX]
78 Joshua M. Murphy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails [SOLVED] Michael Scherer <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at>