1 |
On Monday, December 19, 2016 09:45:21 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote : |
3 |
> > On Sunday, December 18, 2016 03:11:58 PM Peter Humphrey wrote: |
4 |
> > > Peter Humphrey peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > wrote : |
7 |
> > > > This morning I ran my usual daily update and was presented with a long |
8 |
> > > > list of kde-app packages, including KMail-2. The only problem was four |
9 |
> > > > blocks that portage couldn't sort out on its own, so I evicted the |
10 |
> > > > existing versions with emerge -C and continued. |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > > Then kleopatra failed to build, as in bug 602924. The fix there worked |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > (I |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > > > should call it an evasion really) and kleopatra built ok. |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > I should have done some more checking before writing. The fix was to |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > emerge |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > > -C kde-apps/gpgmepp. I don't know whether you can do that before |
23 |
> > > starting |
24 |
> > > the upgrade, but it's worth a try. It might save a lot of work. |
25 |
> > > |
26 |
> > > At any rate, there's no sign of gpgmepp being pulled back in with the |
27 |
> > > new |
28 |
> > > 16.12.0 versions of kde-apps packages, now that the old versions have |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > gone. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > More important, how is the latest kmail behaving? |
33 |
> |
34 |
> It isn't. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I finished the emerge -e world, then @preserved-rebuild presented me with a |
37 |
> whole lot of packages, resulting in the same appalling mess as before: |
38 |
> incompatible versions being required of numerous packages. I've never had |
39 |
> @preserved-rebuild follow an -e world before. |
40 |
|
41 |
Me neither, although I do wonder if it maybe caches something somewhere. |
42 |
I did just now have a preserved-rebuild after a depclean action. |
43 |
(This was after a clean update and no preserved-rebuild necessary prior to the |
44 |
depclean) |
45 |
|
46 |
> I've reverted to a week-old system backup, but now when I invoke KMail I get |
47 |
> a dialogue box saying "This will start the program kmail -qwindowtitle %c |
48 |
> %u. If you do not trust this program, click Cancel". What? Of course I |
49 |
> trust it, so I click Continue, and I get "Unable to make the service KMail |
50 |
> executable, aborting execution" |
51 |
> |
52 |
> What could possible go wrong with a simple offline tarring of files to USB |
53 |
> disk and back again? I know, I know... |
54 |
|
55 |
Did you include all the permissions in the tar during compression and |
56 |
extraction? |
57 |
|
58 |
> Has no-one else tried this upgrade? |
59 |
|
60 |
No, did try today, but as it has a conflict with dependencies for kmymoney |
61 |
(which isn't yet for slot 5), I am unwilling to proceed on this laptop. |
62 |
|
63 |
I will test my desktop later today/this week. |
64 |
|
65 |
-- |
66 |
Joost |