Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] At last! A Qt5 version of KMail-2 - but here be dragons!
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:59:55
Message-Id: 3468536.D7s9eC0rdl@peak
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] At last! A Qt5 version of KMail-2 - but here be dragons! by "J. Roeleveld"
1 On Monday 19 Dec 2016 14:14:56 J. Roeleveld wrote:
2 > On Monday, December 19, 2016 09:45:21 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
3 > > J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote :
4 > > > On Sunday, December 18, 2016 03:11:58 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
5 > > > > Peter Humphrey peter@××××××××××××.uk>
6 > > >
7 > > > wrote :
8 > > > > > This morning I ran my usual daily update and was presented with a
9 > > > > > long
10 > > > > > list of kde-app packages, including KMail-2. The only problem was
11 > > > > > four
12 > > > > > blocks that portage couldn't sort out on its own, so I evicted the
13 > > > > > existing versions with emerge -C and continued.
14 > > > > >
15 > > > > > Then kleopatra failed to build, as in bug 602924. The fix there
16 > > > > > worked
17 > > >
18 > > > (I
19 > > >
20 > > > > > should call it an evasion really) and kleopatra built ok.
21 > > > >
22 > > > > I should have done some more checking before writing. The fix was to
23 > > >
24 > > > emerge
25 > > >
26 > > > > -C kde-apps/gpgmepp. I don't know whether you can do that before
27 > > > > starting
28 > > > > the upgrade, but it's worth a try. It might save a lot of work.
29 > > > >
30 > > > > At any rate, there's no sign of gpgmepp being pulled back in with
31 > > > > the
32 > > > > new
33 > > > > 16.12.0 versions of kde-apps packages, now that the old versions
34 > > > > have
35 > > >
36 > > > gone.
37 > > >
38 > > > More important, how is the latest kmail behaving?
39 > >
40 > > It isn't.
41 > >
42 > > I finished the emerge -e world, then @preserved-rebuild presented me
43 > > with a whole lot of packages, resulting in the same appalling mess as
44 > > before: incompatible versions being required of numerous packages. I've
45 > > never had @preserved-rebuild follow an -e world before.
46 >
47 > Me neither, although I do wonder if it maybe caches something somewhere.
48 > I did just now have a preserved-rebuild after a depclean action.
49 > (This was after a clean update and no preserved-rebuild necessary prior to
50 > the depclean)
51 >
52 > > I've reverted to a week-old system backup, but now when I invoke KMail I
53 > > get a dialogue box saying "This will start the program kmail
54 > > -qwindowtitle %c %u. If you do not trust this program, click Cancel".
55 > > What? Of course I trust it, so I click Continue, and I get "Unable to
56 > > make the service KMail executable, aborting execution"
57 > >
58 > > What could possible go wrong with a simple offline tarring of files to
59 > > USB disk and back again? I know, I know...
60 >
61 > Did you include all the permissions in the tar during compression and
62 > extraction?
63
64 The command in my backup script is:
65
66 tar cpf /mnt/sda/peak/main/current/main.tar -C /mnt/main .
67
68 /mnt/main is where my rescue system mounts the main system for backup. Do I
69 need to add --xattrs to the tar command?
70
71
72 --
73 Regards
74 Peter

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] At last! A Qt5 version of KMail-2 - but here be dragons! "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>