1 |
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 09:54:22PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:59:25 -0500, Michael Swanson wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > Is this technique of umask=0 safe to use on an NTFS volume? I want to |
5 |
> > mount an NTFS drive on my desktop so that a regular user can access it. |
6 |
> > Is there a similar way to mount it with only read permissions, |
7 |
> > seeing as writing to NTFS drives isn't usually a particularly good idea |
8 |
> > with Linux. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> NTFS partitions are usually mounted with the ro option (read only) so it |
11 |
> doesn't matter what write permissions you set. But to be certain, you |
12 |
> could set umask=222. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> -- |
16 |
> Neil Bothwick |
17 |
> |
18 |
> "Bother," said Pooh, as he pulled the alien face-hugger off. |
19 |
|
20 |
thanks again. i use "umask=022" that solved the problem perfectly. |
21 |
just write down the permission you want, eg. 755, then 777 minus |
22 |
755, the result is right the value for the "umask". |
23 |
|
24 |
hope it's a useful tip for beginners like me :-) |
25 |
|
26 |
best regards |
27 |
daniel |
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |