| 1 |
On Sunday 02 January 2011 21:18:14 felix@×××××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 01:07:40PM -0800, walt wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 01/02/2011 11:25 AM, felix@×××××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > My 1.9.2 upgrade didn't lose the keys, but it thinks the screen has |
| 5 |
> > > fewer pixels than before, and what it does use is pushed off to the |
| 6 |
> > > right (there is a column down the left side, roughly 10-20% of the |
| 7 |
> > > screen, which is inaccessible). |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > I've included 3 logs -- the working 1.8.2, the failing 1.9.2, and the |
| 10 |
> > > failing /var/log/Xorg.0.log... |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > The 'failing' log shows that the new Xorg-server is using the MACH64 |
| 13 |
> > driver, but your 'working' 1.8.2 log is truncated, so it doesn't tell us |
| 14 |
> > which video driver it was using successfully. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I'm about 99% certain that it has always used the mach64 driver. I |
| 17 |
> wish I had an old enough backup to recover an old log, but this |
| 18 |
> current size screwup has been in effect for a while. It's mostly a |
| 19 |
> server, so X isn't vital, but I do want to get it working again. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> > Given only 8MB of video memory, maybe the vesa driver would work better? |
| 22 |
> > Dunno. Does your BIOS have a setting for the video "aperture"? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
You may get better results if you enable KMS in your kernel. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Mick |
Archives