Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: felix@×××××××.com
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg 1.9.2 and wrong display size
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 21:19:46
Message-Id: 20110102211814.GC5710@crowfix.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg 1.9.2 and wrong display size by walt
1 On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 01:07:40PM -0800, walt wrote:
2 > On 01/02/2011 11:25 AM, felix@×××××××.com wrote:
3 > > My 1.9.2 upgrade didn't lose the keys, but it thinks the screen has
4 > > fewer pixels than before, and what it does use is pushed off to the
5 > > right (there is a column down the left side, roughly 10-20% of the
6 > > screen, which is inaccessible).
7 > >
8 > > I've included 3 logs -- the working 1.8.2, the failing 1.9.2, and the
9 > > failing /var/log/Xorg.0.log...
10 >
11 > The 'failing' log shows that the new Xorg-server is using the MACH64 driver,
12 > but your 'working' 1.8.2 log is truncated, so it doesn't tell us which video
13 > driver it was using successfully.
14
15 I'm about 99% certain that it has always used the mach64 driver. I
16 wish I had an old enough backup to recover an old log, but this
17 current size screwup has been in effect for a while. It's mostly a
18 server, so X isn't vital, but I do want to get it working again.
19
20 > Given only 8MB of video memory, maybe the vesa driver would work better?
21 > Dunno. Does your BIOS have a setting for the video "aperture"?
22
23 No.
24
25 --
26 ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
27 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com
28 GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
29 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg 1.9.2 and wrong display size Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>