1 |
No, it's not the proper numerical order. Yes, it's the proper sort for a |
2 |
sorting algorithm unaware that it's sorting strings with numeric components, |
3 |
such as a one examining input on a strictly codepoint-by-codepoint or |
4 |
character-by-character basis, but that's not the only way to sort. |
5 |
|
6 |
I'd suggest filing a bug. I don't know enough about collations to know whether |
7 |
or not localization is supposed to cover numeric sorting, but the old behavior |
8 |
was clearly better, from a human UI standpoint. |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 03:27:34 PM Andy Mender wrote: |
12 |
> You may be surprised, but this is the proper numerical order - the way |
13 |
> Windows Explorer |
14 |
> normally does it. Only the 1st digit is taken into account as you noticed. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Care to try renaming the images to "image_xxx"? Perhaps that helps. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Best regards, |
19 |
> Andy |
20 |
> |
21 |
> On 20 October 2016 at 14:25, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
22 |
> > Using Gwenview with KDE 4, the thumbnail view showed images |
23 |
> > in correct numerical order : image1 image2 ... image9 image10 ... . |
24 |
> > With KDE 5, it's gone stupid : image1 image11 image12 ... |
25 |
> > image 19 image2 image20 image21 ... |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > Is there a setting anywhere |
28 |
> > to tell it to list files in the proper numerical order ? |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > -- |
31 |
> > ========================,,============================================ |
32 |
> > SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
33 |
> > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
34 |
> > TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |
35 |
-- |
36 |
:wq |