Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild?
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:20:31
Message-Id: CADPrc81v2t+t5MLW0SBxyVLbbuidGepV42NmimHNkm-Mmbp46A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? by Alan Mackenzie
1 On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote:
2 > Hi, Michael.
3 >
4 > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:03:19PM +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
5 >> Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 16:43:39 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
6 >> > Is that right?  How about it being saner to conform to standardised
7 >> > interfaces, protocols and formats?
8 >
9 >> How about IPP?
10 >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Printing_Protocol
11 >
12 >> Oh wait... that's what cups is using.
13 >
14 > Ah yes, a standard.  So we have the choice between all the IPP
15 > implementations.  That's cups and, ... err - is there another one?
16
17 The point is that it is a standard, not a proprietary protocol. The
18 proof is that it works on every operating system.
19
20 > But why should I have to use an over the top bloated "Internet" protocol?
21 > I've got one single printer on the end of a USB cable.  I want a simple
22 > spooler, as simple as possible and not simpler.
23
24 Nobody is forcing you to anything: but upstream projects (like
25 LibreOffice) need to fulfill the needs of all their users... not only
26 you. Don't force *them* to support every single printing system in the
27 planet earth; it's Open Source, if it's so important to you, write the
28 lpr support for LibreOffice.
29
30 >> > No, the sane alternative is to use the `lpr' command, possibly augmented
31 >> > by special arguments for particular spoolers, but always having a
32 >> > fallback to standard `lpr'.  That way, everybody's happy.  Even me.  ;-)
33 >
34 >> How about the lpr command provided by cups?
35 >> Does it not work for you?
36 >
37 > I believe it did work for me for the short time I had cups installed.
38 > More pertinent is, why won't the lpr command work for LibreOffice?
39
40 Because the Open Source community has limited resources. The
41 LibreOffice devs (or maybe the Gentoo ones) choose to support CUPS and
42 only CUPS, because it takes care of the most cases, not only yours.
43
44 Regards.
45 --
46 Canek Peláez Valdés
47 Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
48 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>