Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:03:48
Message-Id: CAGOe-ezunYGe8hV-wKD+P8o26S_-SKLCw03Lxv7m1oJbU1wQ=A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application by Mick
1 On 15 May 2012 23:19, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 15 May 2012 22:08:17 you wrote:
3
4 >> I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly
5 >> think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug.
6 >>
7 >> Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to
8 >> say?
9 >
10 > I haven't yet, because it is not just Chromium that's not working as it is
11 > supposed to (although it is the most vocal app on the terminal when called
12 > with tsocks).  I haven't yet found an app which will work with tsocks at all.
13
14 OK, I just noticed that launching chromium from a terminal brings up
15 this error, so it is not tsocks specific:
16
17 $ chromium
18 [4163:4174:213397467:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
19 method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
20 org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
21
22
23 > The fact that proxychains does not work at all (applications completely ignore
24 > it and run outside the tunnel) made me question the sanity of my set up.  Is
25 > there anything other than coincidence that would cause both apps to fail?
26
27 Yep, it is a coincidence it seems:
28
29 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408427
30
31 --
32 Regards,
33 Mick