Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:22:09
Message-Id: 201205152320.13242.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application by Alan McKinnon
1 On Tuesday 15 May 2012 22:08:17 you wrote:
2 > On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:57:26 +0100
3 > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
4
5 > > I am not sure if the problem is related to the tsocks LD_PRELOAD
6 > > error.
7 >
8 > It almost certainly is, tsocks uses LD_PRELOAD to mangle it's magic so
9 > that stuff works. I believe chromium has severe issues with tsocks
10 > because of how it does it's sandboxing, but I honestly don't know how
11 > to get around that.
12 >
13 > On a properly setup Gentoo amd64 system, /lib is a link to /lib64, so
14 > the error you get is not a path error, the chromium binary really
15 > cannot (or will not) deal with tsocks.so
16 >
17 > I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly
18 > think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug.
19 >
20 > Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to
21 > say?
22
23 I haven't yet, because it is not just Chromium that's not working as it is
24 supposed to (although it is the most vocal app on the terminal when called
25 with tsocks). I haven't yet found an app which will work with tsocks at all.
26
27 The fact that proxychains does not work at all (applications completely ignore
28 it and run outside the tunnel) made me question the sanity of my set up. Is
29 there anything other than coincidence that would cause both apps to fail?
30 --
31 Regards,
32 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>