| 1 |
> emerge -uNDvp world comes out clean. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Hmm. I just commented an entry in package keywords and after that it |
| 4 |
showed up the same way as reported it. If i run portage it wants to |
| 5 |
downgrade that particular package. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I can not find |
| 8 |
> gentoo-sources-2.6.23-r3 in any file in /etc/portage/package.* so sort |
| 9 |
> of curious about that. I did check and I am not using that version |
| 10 |
> anymore so I unmerged it. Maybe that will fix that. o_O |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This should fix it! It was my mistake. Eix is looking up its database |
| 13 |
and does not find gentoo-sources-2.6.23-r3 because it has been removed |
| 14 |
from the tree thus it gets reported. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Still waiting on that light bulb moment. I been studying this thing the |
| 17 |
> past couple days on my own so it's a bit . . . muddy, in here. LOL |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Dale |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> :-) :-) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
@Vaeth |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Maybe you can enlighten me. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
eix-test-obsolete checks first for non matching entries in a package |
| 29 |
file e.g. if I have an entry with a typo or a removed package then it |
| 30 |
will be reported. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
But what is the difference between a "redundant entry" and an |
| 33 |
"uninstalled entry". As far as I see the matching criteria of both |
| 34 |
checks is a package which is not installed or in the database but in a |
| 35 |
package.* file. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Btw: eix-test-obsolete can not check for obsolete use-flags at the moment? |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Regards, |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Daniel |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives