| 1 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:50:02 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Lots of other things use them as well - not just X, so thats not a |
| 4 |
> reason (and lots of systems that dont have X but need dbus and hal). I |
| 5 |
> would like to know why they are started in the default run-level, not at |
| 6 |
> boot which seems more reasonable for low level hardware support. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Because they don't need to go in boot, as evidenced by the successful |
| 9 |
booting of your system. The boot runlevel is for those services that have |
| 10 |
to be started before anything else. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Dbus doesn't need to be put in any runlevel, it will be started when hald |
| 13 |
needs it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
One person's error is another person's data. |
Archives