| 1 |
Am 2015-10-06 um 09:45 schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:35:40 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> How about btrfs send/receive? I've never used them but used |
| 5 |
>>> the equivalent with ZFS and it was simple to do. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I think "btrfs-replace" is my friend. Will try that later. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If you want to keep the system live, replace will do the trick, but |
| 10 |
> when I tried it to replace a drive that was showing SMART errors it |
| 11 |
> was VERY slow. btrfs send serialises your whole filesystem to a |
| 12 |
> file so it should be much faster. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
btrfs send would also have the benefit that I won't lose the |
| 15 |
source-dev in the process. btrfs-replace would "empty" my hdd, if then |
| 16 |
things fail I don't have that backup again to start from. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I just have to find out how to keep the UUID to keep the copy booting etc |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I will try that later this day, after some job work. |
Archives