Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/shadow
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:35:41
Message-Id: 20120312173416.06817095@fuchsia.remarqs.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/shadow by Alan McKinnon
1 On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:29:10 +0200
2 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get PROVIDES
5 > support in portage?
6
7 IMO, it would take virtuals causing so many headachy breakages that
8 some devs started keeping up a steady drumbeat on irc and mailing
9 lists. When the number of virtual packages gets close to a thousand,
10 I'd guess that might happen. Then there would be years of discussion
11 and GLEP proposals, and by EAPI 207 it should be done.
12
13 ;)

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: virtual/shadow Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com>