Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Skwar <alexanders.mailinglists+nospam@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Python vs C++ | ||
| Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:01:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1965113.Ad6THdCgeY@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules] by David Relson |
||
| 1 | David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I |
| 4 | > suspect C++ runs somewhat faster, but that's not the issue here. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Is that actually true (especially for the Portage case)? I'd |
| 7 | suspect that portage sometimes tends to be slow, because of |
| 8 | the myriad of files it has to deal with. So it's I/O which is |
| 9 | slow. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Would that problem go away, if the "engine" would be rewritten |
| 12 | in C++? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Alexander |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Python vs C++ | Ritesh Kumar <ritesh@××××××.edu> |