| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:35:10PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@×××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > I don’t really care about performance. It’s a simple media archive powered |
| 5 |
> > by the cheapest Haswell Celeron I could get (with 16 Gigs of ECC RAM though |
| 6 |
> > ^^). Sorry if I more or less stole the thread, but this is almost the same |
| 7 |
> > topic. I could use a nudge in either direction. My workplace’s storage |
| 8 |
> > comprises many 2× mirrors, but I am not a company and I am capped at four |
| 9 |
> > bays. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > So, Do you have any input for me before I fetch the dice? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> IMO the cost savings for parity RAID trumps everything unless money |
| 15 |
> just isn't a factor. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cost saving compared to what? In my four-bay-scenario, mirror and raidz2 |
| 18 |
yield the same available space (I hope so). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
| 22 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Advanced mathematics have the advantage that you can err more accurately. |
Archives